This post describes in detail the upstream OpenStack continuous integration platform. In the process, I’ll be describing the code flow in the upstream system — from the time the contributor submits a patch to Gerrit, all the way through the creation of a devstack environment in a virtual machine, the running of the Tempest test suite against the devstack installation, and finally the reporting of test results and archival of test artifacts. Hopefully, with a good understanding of how the upstream tooling works, setting up your own linked external testing platform will be easier.
[toc]
Some History and Concepts
Over the past four years, there has been a steady evolution in the way that the source code of OpenStack projects is tested and reviewed. I remember when we used Bazaar for source control and Launchpad merge proposals for code review. There was no automated or continuous testing to speak of in those early days, which put pressure on core reviewers to do testing of proposed patches locally. There was also no standardized integration test suite, so often a change in one project would inadvertantly break another project.
Thanks to the work of many contributors, particularly those patient souls in the OpenStack Infrastructure team, today there is a robust platform supporting continuous integration testing for OpenStack and Stackforge projects. At the center of this platform are the Jenkins CI servers, the Gerrit git and patch review server, and the Zuul gating system.
The Code Review System
When a contributor submits a patch to one of the OpenStack projects, one pushes their code to the git server managed by Gerrit running on review.openstack.org. Typically, contributors use the git-review Git plugin, which simplifies submitting to a git server managed by Gerrit. Gerrit controls which users or groups are allowed to propose code, merge code, and administer code repositories under its management. When a contributor pushes code to review.openstack.org, Gerrit creates a Changeset representing the proposed code. The original submitter and any other contributors can push additional amendments to that Changeset, and Gerrit collects all of the changes into the Changeset record. Here is a shot of a Changeset under review. You can see a number of patches (changes) listed in the review screen. Each of those patches was an amendment to the original commit.

For each patch in Gerrit, there are three sets of “labels” that may be applied to the patch. Anyone can comment on a Changeset and/or review the code. A review is shown on the patch in the Code-Review column in the patch “labels matrix”:

Non-core team members may give the patch a Code-Review label of +1 (Looks good to me), 0 (No strong opinion), or -1 (I would prefer you didn’t merge this). Core team members can give any of those values, plus +2 (Looks good to me, approved) and -2 (Do not submit).
The other columns in the label matrix are Verified and Approved. Only non-interactive users of Gerrit, such as Jenkins, are allowed to add a Verified label to a patch. The external testing platform you will set up is one of these non-interactive users. The value of the Verified label will be +1 (check pipeline tests passed), -1 (check pipeline tests failed), +2 (gate pipeline tests passed), or -2 (gate pipeline tests failed).
Only members of the OpenStack project’s core team can add an Approved label to a patch. It is either a +1 (Approved) value or not, appearing as a check mark in the Approved column of the label matrix:

Continuous Integration Testing
Continuous integration (CI) testing is the act of running tests that validate a full application environment on a continual basis — i.e. when any change is proposed to the application. Typically, when talking about CI, we are referring to tests that are run against a full, real-world installation of the project. This type of testing, called integration testing, ensures that proposed changes to one component do not cause failures in other components. This is especially important for complex multi-project systems like OpenStack, with non-trivial dependencies between subsystems.
When code is pushed to Gerrit, a series of jobs are triggered that run a series of tests against the proposed code. Jenkins is the server that executes and manages these jobs. It is a Java application with an extensible architecture that supports plugins that add functionality to the base server.
Each job in Jenkins is configured separately. Behind the scenes, Jenkins stores this configuration information in an XML file in its data directory. You may manually edit a Jenkins job as an administrator in Jenkins. However, in a testing platform as large as the upstream OpenStack CI system, doing so manually would be virtually impossible and fraught with errors. Luckily, there is a helper tool called Jenkins Job Builder (JJB) that constructs these XML configuration files after reading a set of YAML files and job templating rules. We will describe JJB later in the article.
The “Gate”
When we talk about “the gate”, we are talking about the process by which code is kept out of a set of source code branches if certain conditions are not met.
OpenStack projects use a method of controlling merges into certain branches of their source trees called the Non-Human Gatekeeper model [1]
. Gerrit (the non-human) is configured to allow merges by users in a group called “Non-Interactive Users” to the master and stable branches of git repositories under its control. The upstream main Jenkins CI server, as well as Jenkins CI systems running at third party locations, are the users in this group.
So, how do these non-interactive users actually decide whether to merge a proposed patch into the target branch? Well, there is a set of tests (different for each project) — unit, functional, integration, upgrade, style/linting — that is marked as “gating” that particular project’s source trees. For most of the OpenStack projects, there are unit tests (run in a variety of different supported versions of Python) and style checker tests for HACKING and PEP8 compliance. These unit and style tests are run in Python virtualenvs managed by the tox testing utility.
In addition to the Python unit and style tests, there are a number of integration tests that are executed against full installations of OpenStack. The integration tests are simply subsets of the Tempest integration test suite. Finally, many projects also include upgrade and schema migration tests in their gate tests.
How Upstream Testing Works
Graphically, the upstream continuous integration gate testing system works like this:

We step through this event flow in detail below, referencing the numbered steps in bold.
The Gerrit Event Stream and Zuul
After a contributor has pushed (1a) a new patch to a changeset or a core team member has reviewed the patch and added an Approved +1 label (1b), Gerrit pushes out a notification event to its event stream (2). This event stream can have a number of subscribers, including the Gerrit Jenkins plugin and Zuul. Zuul was developed to manage the many complex graphs of interdependent branch merge proposals in the upstream system. It monitors in-progress jobs for a set of related patches and will pre-emptively cancel any dependent test jobs that would not succeed due to a failure in a dependent patch [2]
.
In addition to this dependency monitoring, Zuul is responsible for constructing the pipelines of jobs that should be executed on various events. One of these pipelines is called the “gate” pipeline, appropriately named for the set of jobs that must succeed in order for a proposed patch to be merged into a target branch.
Zuul’s pipelines are configured in a single file called layout.yaml in the OpenStack-Infra config project. Here’s a snippet from that file that constructs the gate pipeline:
- name: gate description: Changes that have been approved by core developers... failure-message: Build failed. For information on how to proceed... manager: DependentPipelineManager precedence: low trigger: gerrit: - event: comment-added approval: - approved: 1 - event: comment-added comment_filter: (?i)^\s*reverify( (?:bug|lp)[\s#:]*(\d+))\s*$ start: gerrit: verified: 0 success: gerrit: verified: 2 submit: true failure: gerrit: verified: -2
Zuul listens to the Gerrit event stream (3), and matches the type of event to one or more pipelines (4). The matching conditions for the gate pipeline are configured in the trigger:gerrit:
section of the YAML snippet above:
trigger: gerrit: - event: comment-added approval: - approved: 1 - event: comment-added comment_filter: (?i)^\s*reverify( (?:bug|lp)[\s#:]*(\d+))\s*$
The above indicates that Zuul should fire the gate pipeline when it sees reviews with an Approved +1 label, and any comment to the review that contains “reverify” with or without a bug identifier. Note that there is a similar pipeline that is fired when a new patchset is created or when a review comment is made with the word “recheck”. This pipeline is called the check pipeline. Look in the layout.yaml file for the configuration of the check pipeline.
Once the appropriate pipeline is matched, Zuul executes (5) that particular pipeline for the project that had a patch proposed.
“But wait, hold up…“, you may be asking yourself, “how does Zuul know which Jenkins jobs to execute for a particular project and pipeline?“. Great question! 🙂
Also in the layout.yaml file, there is a section that configures which Jenkins jobs should be run for each project. Let’s take a look at the configuration of the gate pipeline for the Cinder project:
- name: openstack/cinder template: - name: python-jobs ...snip... gate: - gate-cinder-requirements - gate-tempest-dsvm-full - gate-tempest-dsvm-postgres-full - gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron - gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops - gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-large-ops - gate-grenade-dsvm
Each of the lines in the gate:
section indicate a specific Jenkins job that should be run in the gate pipeline for Cinder. In addition, there is the python-jobs
item in the template:
section. Project templates are a way that Zuul consolidates configuration of many similar jobs into a simple template configuration. The project template definition for python-jobs looks like this (still in layout.yaml
:
project-templates: - name: python-jobs ...snip... gate: - 'gate-{name}-docs' - 'gate-{name}-pep8' - 'gate-{name}-python26' - 'gate-{name}-python27'
So, on determing which Jenkins jobs should be executed for a particular pipeline, Zuul sees the python-jobs
project template in the Cinder configuration and expands that to execute the following Jenkins jobs:
- gate-cinder-docs
- gate-cinder-pep8
- gate-cinder-python26
- gate-cinder-python27
Jenkins Job Creation and Configuration
I previously mentioned that the configuration of an individual Jenkins job is stored in a config.xml
file in the Jenkins data directory. Now, at last count, the upstream OpenStack Jenkins CI system has just shy of 2,000 jobs. It would be virtually impossible to manage the configuration of so many jobs using human-based processes. To solve this dilemma, the Jenkins Job Builder (JJB) python tool was created. JJB consumes YAML files that describe both individual Jenkins jobs as well as templates for parameterized Jenkins jobs, and writes the config.xml files for all Jenkins jobs that are produced from those templates. Important: Note that Zuul does not construct Jenkins jobs. JJB does that. Zuul simply configures which Jenkins jobs should run for a project and a pipeline.
There is a master projects.yaml
file in the same directory that lists the “top-level” definitions of jobs for all projects, and it is in this file that many of the variables that are used in job template instantiation are defined (including the {name}
variable, which corresponds to the name of the project.
When JJB constructs the set of all Jenkins jobs, it reads the projects.yaml
file, and for each project, it sees the “name” attribute of the project, and substitutes that name attribute value wherever it sees {name}
in any of the jobs that are defined for that project. Let’s take a look at the Cinder project’s definition in the projects.yaml
file here:
- project: name: cinder github-org: openstack node: bare-precise tarball-site: tarballs.openstack.org doc-publisher-site: docs.openstack.org jobs: - python-jobs - python-grizzly-bitrot-jobs - python-havana-bitrot-jobs - openstack-publish-jobs - gate-{name}-pylint - translation-jobs
You will note one of the items in the jobs section is called python-jobs. This is actually not a single Jenkins job, but actually a job group. A job group definition is merely a list of jobs or job templates. Let’s take a look at the definition of the python-jobs
job group:
- job-group: name: python-jobs jobs: - '{name}-coverage' - 'gate-{name}-pep8' - 'gate-{name}-python26' - 'gate-{name}-python27' - 'gate-{name}-python33' - 'gate-{name}-pypy' - 'gate-{name}-docs' - 'gate-{name}-requirements' - '{name}-tarball' - '{name}-branch-tarball'
Each of the items listed in the jobs section of the python-jobs
job group definition above is a job template. Job templates are expanded in the same way as Zuul project templates and JJB job groups are expanded. Let’s take a look at one such job template in the list above, called gate-{name}-python27
.
(Hint: all Jenkins jobs for any OpenStack or Stackforge project are described in the OpenStack-Infra Config project’s modules/openstack_projects/files/jenkins_jobs/config/ directory).
The python-jobs.yaml
file in the modules/openstack_project/files/jenkins_job_builder/config
directory contains the definition of common Python project Jenkins job templates. One of those job templates is gate-{name}-python27
:
- job-template: name: 'gate-{name}-python27' ... snip ... builders: - gerrit-git-prep - python27: github-org: '{github-org}' project: '{name}' - assert-no-extra-files publishers: - test-results - console-log node: '{node}'
Looking through the above job template definition, you will see a section called “builders“. The builders section of a job template lists (in sequential order of expected execution) the executable sections or scripts of the Jenkins job. The first executable section in the gate-{name}-python27
job template is called “gerrit-git-prep“. This executable section is defined in macros.yaml
, which contains a number of commonly-run scriptlets. Here’s the entire gerrit-git-prep macro definition:
- builder: name: gerrit-git-prep builders: - shell: "/usr/local/jenkins/slave_scripts/gerrit-git-prep.sh https://review.openstack.org http://zuul.openstack.org git://git.openstack.org"
So, gerrit-git-prep is simply executing a Bash script called “gerrit-git-prep.sh” that is stored in the /usr/local/jenkins/slave_scripts/
directory. Let’s take a look at that file. You can find it in the /modules/jenkins/files/slave_scripts/
[3]
directory in the same OpenStack Infra Config project:
#!/bin/bash -e GERRIT_SITE=$1 ZUUL_SITE=$2 GIT_ORIGIN=$3 # ... snip ... set -x if [[ ! -e .git ]] then ls -a rm -fr .[^.]* * if [ -d /opt/git/$ZUUL_PROJECT/.git ] then git clone file:///opt/git/$ZUUL_PROJECT . else git clone $GIT_ORIGIN/$ZUUL_PROJECT . fi fi git remote set-url origin $GIT_ORIGIN/$ZUUL_PROJECT # attempt to work around bugs 925790 and 1229352 if ! git remote update then echo "The remote update failed, so garbage collecting before trying again." git gc git remote update fi git reset --hard if ! git clean -x -f -d -q ; then sleep 1 git clean -x -f -d -q fi if [ -z "$ZUUL_NEWREV" ] then git fetch $ZUUL_SITE/p/$ZUUL_PROJECT $ZUUL_REF git checkout FETCH_HEAD git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD if ! git clean -x -f -d -q ; then sleep 1 git clean -x -f -d -q fi else git checkout $ZUUL_NEWREV git reset --hard $ZUUL_NEWREV if ! git clean -x -f -d -q ; then sleep 1 git clean -x -f -d -q fi fi if [ -f .gitmodules ] then git submodule init git submodule sync git submodule update --init fi |
The purpose of the script above is simple: Check out the source code of the proposed Gerrit changeset and ensure that the source tree is clean of any cruft from a previous run of a Jenkins job that may have run in the same Jenkins workspace. The concept of a workspace is important. When Jenkins runs a job, it must execute that job from within a workspace. The workspace is really just an isolated shell environment and filesystem directory that has a set of shell variables export’d inside it that indicate a variety of important identifiers, such as the Jenkins job ID, the name of the source code project that has triggered a job, the SHA1 git commit ID of the particular proposed changeset that is being tested, etc [4]
.
The next builder in the job template is the “python27” builder, which has two variables injected into itself:
- python27: github-org: '{github-org}' project: '{name}'
The github-org variable is a string of the already existing {github-org} variable value. The project variable is populated with the value of the {name} variable. Here’s how the python27 builder is defined (in macros.yaml
:
- builder: name: python27 builders: - shell: "/usr/local/jenkins/slave_scripts/run-unittests.sh 27 {github-org} {project}"
Again, just a wrapper around another Bash script, called run-unittests.sh
in the /usr/local/jenkins/slave_scripts
directory. Here’s what that script looks like:
version=$1 org=$2 project=$3 # ... snip ... venv=py$version # ... snip ... source /usr/local/jenkins/slave_scripts/select-mirror.sh $org $project tox -e$venv result=$? echo "Begin pip freeze output from test virtualenv:" echo "======================================================================" .tox/$venv/bin/pip freeze echo "======================================================================" if [ -d ".testrepository" ] ; then # ... snip ... .tox/$venv/bin/python /usr/local/jenkins/slave_scripts/subunit2html.py ./subunit_log.txt testr_results.html gzip -9 ./subunit_log.txt gzip -9 ./testr_results.html # ... snip ... fi # ... snip ... |
In short, for the Python 2.7 builder, the above runs the command tox -epy27
and then runs a prettifying script and gzips up the results of the unit test run. And that’s really the meat of the Jenkins job. We will discuss the publishing of the job artifacts a little later in this article, but if you’ve gotten this far, you have delved deep into the mines of the OpenStack CI system. Congratulations!
Devstack-Gate and Running Tempest Against a Real Environment
OK, so unit tests running in a simple Jenkins slave workspace are one thing. But what about Jenkins jobs that run integration tests against a full set of OpenStack endpoints, interacting with real database and message queue services? For these types of Jenkins jobs, things are more complicated. Yes, I know. You probably think things have been complicated up until this point, and you’re right! But the simple unit test jobs above are just the tip of the proverbial iceberg when it comes to the OpenStack CI platform.
For these complex Jenkins jobs, an additional set of tools are added to the mix:
- Nodepool — Provides virtual machine instances to Jenkins masters for running complex, isolation-sensitive Jenkins jobs
- Devstack-Gate — Scripts that create an OpenStack environment with Devstack, run tests against that environment, and archive logs and results
Assignment of a Node to Run a Job
Different Jenkins jobs require different workspaces, or environments, in which to run. For basic unit or style-checking test jobs, like the gate-{name}-python27
job template we dug into above, not much more is needed than a tox-managed virtualenv running in a source checkout of the project with a proposed change. However, for Jenkins jobs that run a series of integration tests against a full OpenStack installation, a workspace with significantly more resources and isolation is necessary. For these latter types of jobs, the upstream CI platform uses a pool of virtual machine instances. This pool of virtual machine instances is managed by a tool called nodepool
. The virtual machines run in both HP Cloud and Rackspace Cloud, who graciously donate these instances for the upstream CI system to use. You can see the configuration of the Nodepool-managed set of instances here.
Instances that are created by Nodepool run Jenkins slave software, so that they can communicate with the upstream Jenkins CI master servers. A script called prepare_node.sh
runs on each Nodepool instance. This script just git clones the OpenStack Infra config project to the node, installs Puppet, and runs a Puppet manifest that sets up the node based on the type of node it is. There are bare nodes, nodes that are meant to run Devstack to install OpenStack, and nodes specific to the Triple-O project. The node type that we will focus on here is the node that is meant to run Devstack. The script that runs to prepare one of these nodes is prepare_devstack_node.sh
, which in turn calls prepare_devstack.sh
. This script caches all of the repositories needed by Devstack, along with Devstack itself, in a workspace cache on the node. This workspace cache is used to enable fast reset of the workspace that is used during the running of a Jenkins job that uses Devstack to construct an OpenStack environment.
Devstack-Gate
The Devstack-Gate project is a set of scripts that are executed by certain Jenkins jobs that need to run integration or upgrade tests against a realistic OpenStack environment. Going back to the Cinder project configuration in the Zuul layout.yaml
file:
- name: openstack/cinder template: - name: python-jobs ... snip ... gate: - gate-cinder-requirements - gate-tempest-dsvm-full - gate-tempest-dsvm-postgres-full - gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron - gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops - gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-large-ops - gate-grenade-dsvm ... snip ...
Note the highlighted line. That Jenkins job template is one such job that needs an isolated workspace that has a full OpenStack environment running on it. Note that “dsvm” stands for “Devstack virtual machine”.
Let’s take a look at the JJB configuration of the gate-tempest-dsvm-full job:
- job-template: name: '{pipeline}-tempest-dsvm-full{branch-designator}' node: '{node}' ... snip ... builders: - devstack-checkout - shell: | #!/bin/bash -xe export PYTHONUNBUFFERED=true export DEVSTACK_GATE_TIMEOUT=180 export DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST=1 export DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST_FULL=1 export BRANCH_OVERRIDE={branch-override} if [ "$BRANCH_OVERRIDE" != "default" ] ; then export OVERRIDE_ZUUL_BRANCH=$BRANCH_OVERRIDE fi cp devstack-gate/devstack-vm-gate-wrap.sh ./safe-devstack-vm-gate-wrap.sh ./safe-devstack-vm-gate-wrap.sh - link-logs publishers: - devstack-logs - console-log
The devstack-checkout
builder is simply a Bash script macro that looks like this:
- builder: name: devstack-checkout builders: - shell: | #!/bin/bash -xe if [[ ! -e devstack-gate ]]; then git clone git://git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/devstack-gate else cd devstack-gate git remote set-url origin git://git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/devstack-gate git remote update git reset --hard if ! git clean -x -f ; then sleep 1 git clean -x -f fi git checkout master git reset --hard remotes/origin/master if ! git clean -x -f ; then sleep 1 git clean -x -f fi cd .. fi
All the above is doing is git clone’ing the devstack-gate repository into the Jenkins workspace, and if the devstack-gate repository already exists, checks out the latest from the master branch.
Returning to our gate-tempest-dsvm-full
JJB job template, we see the remaining part of the builder is a Bash scriptlet like so:
#!/bin/bash -xe export PYTHONUNBUFFERED=true export DEVSTACK_GATE_TIMEOUT=180 export DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST=1 export DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST_FULL=1 export BRANCH_OVERRIDE={branch-override} if [ "$BRANCH_OVERRIDE" != "default" ] ; then export OVERRIDE_ZUUL_BRANCH=$BRANCH_OVERRIDE fi cp devstack-gate/devstack-vm-gate-wrap.sh ./safe-devstack-vm-gate-wrap.sh ./safe-devstack-vm-gate-wrap.sh |
Not all that complicated. It exports some environment variables and copies the devstack-vm-gate-wrap.sh
script out of the devstack-gate repo that was clone’d in the devstack-checkout
macro to the work directory and then runs that script.
The devstack-vm-gate-wrap.sh
script is responsible for setting even more environment variables and then calling the devstack-vm-gate.sh
script, which is where the real magic happens.
Construction of OpenStack Environment with Devstack
The devstack-vm-gate.sh
script is responsible for constructing a full OpenStack environment and running integration tests against that environment. To construct this OpenStack environment, it uses the excellent Devstack project. Devstack is an elaborate series of Bash scripts and functions that clones each OpenStack project source code into /opt/stack/new/$project
[5]
— , runs python setup.py install
in each project checkout, and starts each relevant OpenStack service (e.g. nova-compute
, nova-scheduler
, etc) in a separate Linux screen session.
Devstack’s creation script (stack.sh
) is called from the script after creating the localrc
file that stack.sh
uses when constructing the Devstack environment.
Execution of Integration Tests Against an OpenStack Environment
Once the OpenStack environment is constructed, the devstack-vm-gate.sh
script continue on to run a series of integration tests:
cd $BASE/new/tempest if [[ "$DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST_ALL" -eq "1" ]]; then echo "Running tempest all test suite" sudo -H -u tempest tox -eall -- --concurrency=$TEMPEST_CONCURRENCY res=$? elif [[ "$DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST_FULL" -eq "1" ]]; then echo "Running tempest full test suite" sudo -H -u tempest tox -efull -- --concurrency=$TEMPEST_CONCURRENCY res=$? |
You will note that the $DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST_FULL
Bash environment variable was set to “1” in the gate-tempest-dsvm-full
Jenkins job builder scriptlet.
sudo -H -u tempest tox -efull
triggers the execution of Tempest’s integration test suite. Tempest is the collection of canonical OpenStack integration tests that are used to validate that OpenStack APIs work according to spec and that patches to one OpenStack service do not inadvertently cause failures in another service.
If you are curious what actual commands are run, you can check out the tox.ini
file in Tempest:
[testenv:full] # The regex below is used to select which tests to run and exclude the slow tag: # See the testrepostiory bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/testrepository/+bug/1208610 commands = bash tools/pretty_tox.sh '(?!.*\[.*\bslow\b.*\])(^tempest\.(api|scenario|thirdparty|cli)) {posargs}'
In short, the above runs the Tempest API, scenario, CLI, and thirdparty tests.
Archival of Test Artifacts
The final piece of the puzzle is archiving all of the artifacts from the Jenkins job execution. These artifacts include log files from each individual OpenStack service running in Devstack’s screen sessions, the results of the Tempest test suite runs, as well as echo’d output from the devstack-vm-gate* scripts themselves.
These artifacts are gathered together by the devstack-logs
and console-log
JJB publisher macros:
- publisher: name: console-log publishers: - scp: site: 'static.openstack.org' files: - target: 'logs/$LOG_PATH' copy-console: true copy-after-failure: true - publisher: name: devstack-logs publishers: - scp: site: 'static.openstack.org' files: - target: 'logs/$LOG_PATH' source: 'logs/**' keep-hierarchy: true copy-after-failure: true
Conclusion
I hope this article has helped you understand a bit more how the OpenStack continuous integration platform works. We’ve stepped through the flow through the various components of the platform, including which events trigger what actions in each components. You should now have a good idea how the various parts of the upstream CI infrastructure are configured and where to go look in the source code for more information.
The next article in this series discusses how to construct your own external testing platform that is linked with the upstream OpenStack CI platform. Hopefully, this article will provide you most of the background information you need to understand the steps and tools involved in that external testing platform construction.
[1]
— The link describes and illustrates the non-human gatekeeper model with Bazaar, but the same concept is applicable to Git. See the OpenStack GitWorkflow pages for an illustration of the OpenStack specific model.
[2]
— Zuul really is a pretty awesome bit of code kit. Jim Blair, the author, does an excellent job of explaining the merge proposal dependency graph and how Zuul can “trim” dead-end branches of the dependency graph in the Zuul documentation.
[3]
— Looking for where a lot of the “magic” in the upstream gate happens? Take an afternoon to investigate the scripts in this directory. 🙂
[4]
— Gerrit Jenkins plugin and Zuul export a variety of workspace environment variables into the Jenkins jobs that they trigger. If you are curious what these variables are, check out the Zuul documentation on parameters.
[5]
— The reason the projects are installed into /opt/stack/new/$project
is because the current HEAD of the target git branch for the project is installed into /opt/stack/old/$project
. This is to allow an upgrade test tool called Grenade to test upgrade paths.